The good news is that the number of
startups is rebounding to where it was in the late 1990s. The bad news is that
because of economic changes, it takes more startups than ever to employ the
same number of people.
There has been a sharp uptick in the number of startups in just the last few years. (The bureau of labor statistics has reported numbers only through March of 2013.)
In 2013, the
number of companies less than 2 years old rose by 14%.
The problem is not just that it is
taking the rate of business formation a few years to return to normal. The
problem is that startups don't create as many jobs.
Software is now automating knowledge
work just as machines have been – for centuries – automating physical work.
While this raises productivity it destroys jobs.
It’s cliché – but still true – to
say that the pace of innovation is obsoleting products, companies and jobs more
rapidly than ever. As companies rapidly expand, shrink, and shift focus, they
more rapidly create and destroy jobs.
Outsourcing is more common and
that’s one reason that even successful entrepreneurs don’t need as many
employees. The Kauffman Foundation reported that startups that needed about 8
employees in 2000 could support the same level of sales with only 5 employees
today.
Automation, innovation, outsourcing
and greater efficiencies contribute to an incredibly dynamic job market. In the
second quarter of 2013, the US economy created 7.1 million jobs and destroyed
6.5 million. The net result was 603,000 more jobs than we had at the beginning
of the quarter. That’s nice. But given the rate at which jobs are being
destroyed, the economy has to create 12 new jobs in order to gain one. Compared
to the number of entrepreneurs we’d need in a fictional world where jobs are
created and kept for the length of a career, in this world we need about 12
times as many entrepreneurs.
The good news is that the rate of
startups is recovering. The bad news is that it needs to be higher than it has ever
been before in order to create enough jobs to bring back wage growth and full
employment.
No comments:
Post a Comment