I'm thinking about getting a projector dedicated to "painting" the ceiling with the great art du jour. It'll be like owning my own Sistine chapel but with a team of artists who update the images whenever I whimsically decide. As if I were a pope but, you know, just with jurisdiction over, uh, my ceiling.
27 September 2026
Google Might Become a Tool for Transforming My Living Room Into the Sistine Chapel
I'm thinking about getting a projector dedicated to "painting" the ceiling with the great art du jour. It'll be like owning my own Sistine chapel but with a team of artists who update the images whenever I whimsically decide. As if I were a pope but, you know, just with jurisdiction over, uh, my ceiling.
26 September 2026
What if Jensen Huang Had the Same P/E and Ownership Share As Elon Musk?
What if Nvidia's Jensen Huang had the same deal as Elon Musk, or if Musk had the same deal as Huang? That is, what if the two men owned the same percentage of the company they founded and those companies had the same P/E ratio? The apples to apples comparison is kind of stunning.
The inputs
Nvidia earned $192.88B on a ~$5.4T market cap, a trailing P/E of about 28. Tesla sits at 345x P/E on roughly $4B of earnings. Musk holds ~20% of Tesla and ~38% of SpaceX, which blends to about 30.6% weighted by value. Huang holds roughly 3.5% of Nvidia.
Extreme A — everyone gets Musk's ratios
Musk is already there, so he's unchanged at about $930 billion. (By Forbes' calculations, Musk has been the world's first trillionaire, a milestone he briefly crossed after SpaceX went public.)
Nvidia at Tesla's 345x: $192.88B × 380.61 = $66 trillion. That single company would exceed the entire US stock market by a comfortable margin and be roughly half of world GDP.
Huang at Musk's 30.6% of that: About $20 trillion. That is, Huang would have a net worth roughly equal to China's GDP, and greater than every country on earth except the US.
Extreme B — everyone gets Huang's ratios
Huang is already there, so he's unchanged at roughly $190 billion.
Tesla at 27.5x P/E: about $110B. SpaceX has no earnings, so using Nvidia's price-to-sales of 17.4x on $23B revenue gives about $400B. Combined, Elon's two companies would be valued at roughly $510B if they were priced relative to sales or earnings at similar level as Nvidia.
Musk at Huang's 3.5%: $18 billion.
| Musk | Huang | |
|---|---|---|
| Musk's rules | $930B | $22.5T |
| Huang's rules | $18B | $190B |
| Actual today | ~$930B | ~$190B |
The punchline
Huang wins both extremes. Under Musk's generous rules he's worth 24 times Musk. Under his own stingy rules he's still worth more than ten times Musk. There is no symmetric treatment — same multiple, same ownership share — under which Musk comes out ahead.
Which means Musk's position as the world's wealthiest person doesn't survive equal treatment in either direction. It exists entirely because the two men are being scored by different rules simultaneously: Musk gets a triple-digit multiple on negligible earnings and a thirty-percent ownership stake, while Huang gets a twenty-seven-times multiple on colossal earnings and a three-percent stake. Take either advantage away and the ranking inverts. Take both and it inverts by an order of magnitude.
I recently heard a couple of guys who short stocks on Steve Eisman's podcast. Eisman asked them about their experience at shorting Tesla, which seemed to them clearly overvalued. The one guy quipped, "We learned that you never short a cult." It is, indeed, a curious set of beliefs that sustain Elon's net worth.
Little Known Fact About Yale
How AI Could Affect the Election This November
I'm optimistic about how AI might change voting.
Roughly a third of Americans identify as Democrats and a third as Republicans. The remaining third — the independents who decide elections — have the most to gain from AI, because they're the ones party labels serve worst.
Google search let you type "November election" and find websites arguing for or against candidates and propositions. Useful, but it amounted to locating advocacy that already existed, written months earlier for someone other than you. More arranged marriage than courtship.
An AI conversation works differently. You can say: "I think wealthier people should pay more in taxes, but I'm unsure about the mechanism in Proposition 40.[California Proposition 40, One-Time Wealth Tax for State-Funded Healthcare, Education, and Food Assistance Programs Initiative, more popularly known as the billionaire tax.]
"What are the pros and cons?" Or: "Are there studies on how a billionaire tax might affect startup activity in California?" You bring your own bundle of values and half-formed theories about how the economy works, and the answers get built around them rather than around a position someone was already selling.
You might come away more committed to the billionaire tax than any group campaigning for it. You might find it violates something you care about and decide you can't support it. Either way, the conclusion is more likely to be yours. (And yes, one is vulnerable to manipulation from AI. The odds of that are never zero but my own experience of exploring AI's ability to parse arguments suggest they are at least as objective as policy wonks and professors - perhaps more so. And their responses - unlike found content on the internet - is a direct response to your specific inquiry. And one is hardly limited to a single AI for such queries.)
The shift is from finding a prerecorded message to having a conversation — one where you're heard before you listen.
If this works, political advertising should lose some of its grip. A voter who can say "this matters more to me than that" is harder to move with thirty seconds of television, and money in politics buys less.
Here's a way to test it: the share of ballots that include votes on propositions.
Down-ballot measures consistently draw fewer votes than races for president, senator, or governor. Propositions are confusing and time-consuming to understand, and voters who don't know how one aligns with their values often skip it rather than guess.
If people find a process that gives them confidence about an obscure measure, that drop-off should shrink. Rising proposition turnout wouldn't prove AI caused it, but it would be the first visible sign that voters have found a new way to decide what they actually want.
25 September 2026
College Football 2040s - an Odd Prediction
The transfer portal allows even star players to change teams from season to season.
College football, 2040s:
The transfer portal becomes a live bidding market, allowing even star players to change teams during the game, based on real-time offers from fans.
“Johnson was an Alabama receiver when this drive began, but Ohio State fans have really stepped up.”
Joe Biden: We Know Our Future Is Bound to Yours
The United States seeks a more secure, more prosperous, more equitable world for all people because we know our future is bound to yours. Let me repeat that again: We know our future is bound to yours.
And no nation can meet the challenges of today alone.
The generations who precede us — preceded us organized this body, the United Nations, and built international financial institutions and multilateral and regional bodies to help take on the challenges of their time.
It isn’t always perfect — it wasn’t always perfect. But working together, the world made some remarkable and undeniable progress that improved the lives of all people.
We avoided the renewal of global conflict while lifting more than 1 billion people — 1 billion people — out of extreme poverty.
We together expanded access to education for millions of children.
We saved tens of millions of lives that would have otherwise have been lost to preventable and treatable diseases like measles, malaria, tuberculosis.
HIV/AIDS infections and deaths plummeted in no small part because of PEPFAR’s work in more than 55 countries, saving more than 25 million lives.
It’s a profound testament to what we can achieve when we act together when we take on tough challenges and an admonition for us to urgently accelerate our progress so that no one is left behind, because too many people are being left behind.
The institutions we built together at the end of the second world war are an enduring bedrock of our progress, and the United States is committed to sustaining them.
And this year, we’re proud to rejoin UNESCO. But we also recognize that to meet the new challenges of our decades-old institutions and approaches, they must be updated to keep pace with the world.
https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/remarks-by-president-biden-before-the-78th-session-of-the-united-nations-general-assembly-new-york-ny/
Genesis or Exodus
24 September 2026
National Intelligence to Integrate Popular Will, Expert Opinion and Constitutional Realities
Popular will defines the values and desired outcomes; expertise maps the possibilities and consequences; entrepreneurship turns promising combinations into experiments from which society can learn.
Put differently ... Democracy tells us what matters. Expertise tells us what may work. Entrepreneurship helps us find out.
Each country will have its own AI and this will be as integral to the democratic process as its constitution, laws, policies and precedent, translating popular will into what is possible. It might look like this table:
23 September 2026
Howard Gardner's Missing Intelligence
Then he spent time with Jerome.
After that, he began to wonder whether Gardner shouldn't have added at least one more: Conspiratorial Intelligence.
He was loath to call it intelligence, exactly, and yet there was a kind of mad genius to Jerome's spectacularly convoluted worldview.
22 September 2026
Entrepreneurship is the Capacity to Move with the Constraints in Your Company, Market, and Even Economy
Follow That Dress!
In The Future ...
21 September 2026
Trump's Approval Ratings Continue to Fall
Kevin Kelly on Optimism
"If you look around you, the world is a museum of passion projects by optimists. Everything that we like was made by some crazy, optimistic person."
- Kevin Kelly
The Most Limiting Belief?
Possibly the most limiting belief is "I can do this myself."
20 September 2026
Elf Improvement - a Ray of Hope in Dark Days
19 September 2026
What AI Could Mean for GDP Growth and the Unemployment Rate Among Knowledge Workers
For all of your life, knowledge work or what they're calling cognitive occupations in this report, has easily included the best paying jobs. Those jobs are likely to wane in importance, pay and demand. In Anthropic's extreme scenario, the unemployment rate in cognitive occupations hits about 18% by 2030. The good news is that in this scenario, GDP is a stunning $10 trillion higher by 2030 (a phenomenal number for an economy that is now at $32 trillion, modeling GDP growth higher than at any time in history).
You might find their scenarios interesting. You are likely already living in one of them.
18 September 2026
Karl Rove Calls Out "Raw, Uncut Bigotry" in a Texan Republican Candidate
Why?
Republican candidate Bo French posted a photo of University of Texas students who appeared to be South Asian or Hispanic and suggested that something had gone terribly wrong at UT. He later said his concern was that there were too many “foreigners.”
Rove called it “raw, uncut bigotry.”
And decided this was one Republican he would vote against.
I Used to be Somebody
Now? Now I'm just like everyone else. Slipped back into the crowd. Anonymous again for another 364 days until the next birthday arrives. And what a price to pay for ephemeral fame: getting another year older.
Ageing is such a dubious project.